Validity of Criticism of the Maudhu' Hadith: Comparative Study of Nashiruddin Albani and Syuhudi Ismail's Methodology

Sulis Nuriyawati; Muhammad Syaikhur Ridho

doi:10.31943/afkarjournal.v9i3.3465

Authors

Sulis Nuriyawati Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Muhammad Syaikhur Ridho Universitas Islam negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v9i3.3465

Keywords:

Validity, Maudhu' Hadith, Albani, Syuhudi

Abstract

This study discusses the validity of maudhu’’ hadith criticism based on a comparative study of the methodologies of Nashiruddin Albani and Syuhudi Ismail. As contemporary hadith critics in the 20th century, they certainly have their own views on minor rules in determining the validity of the naqd al-Hadith. This is because the criteria for both minor rules in assessing the connection of the sanad and the justice and the shi'ifan of the narrator have the same elements. The similarity of these minor rules gives rise to the criteria of order in determining the validity of the hadith or judging the validity of the narrator and his narration. The purpose of this study seeks to explore the typology of the validity of both critics in validating the validity of the narrator and his narration. The academic anxiety that arises is how the validity of the maudhu’’ hadith criticism of these two figures in determining the authenticity and shi'ifan in the aspects of sanad and matan. This research method uses a qualitative study, namely descriptive-analytical, based on the main works of these figures in studying maudhu’’ hadith and its authenticity. The results of this comparative study of the two contributions indicate that Albani's strict criteria for interpreting hadith are classified as moderate criticism because his validity critical analysis is based on classical scholars' criticism and an evaluation of his research. Meanwhile, Syuhudi Ismail prioritizes the contextual aspect of matn (matan) after successful sanad research. Therefore, the two differ in their approaches to validating the validity of hadith.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

al-’Azami, M. Musthafa. Studies in Hadith Methodology and Literature. Riyadh: The Other Press, 1977.

al-Albani, Muhammad Nashiruddin. Silsilah Al-Dha’ifah Al-Maudhu’ah Wa Atsaruha Al-Sayyi’ Fii Al-Ummah. Riyadh: Maktabah al-Ma’arif, n.d.

al-Hadi, Abu Azam. Studi Al-Hadith. Jember: Pena Salsabila, 2015.

al-Shiddieqy, Hasbi. Sejarah Dan Pengantar Ilmu Hadis. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1987.

Albani, Nashiruddin. Maqalat Al-Albani: Risalah Ilmiah Al-Albani. Jakarta: Pustaka Azzam, 2002.

Bamualim, Mubarok bin. Biografi Syaikh Al-Albani: Mujaddid Dan Ahli Hadis Abad Ini. Bogor: Pustaka Imam Syafi’i, 2002.

Brown, Daniel W. Relevansi Sunnah Dalam Islam Modern. Bandung: Mizan, 2000.

Dadah, Dadah, and Cecep Rahmat. “Metode Kritik Hadis Perspektif Muhammad Syuhudi Ismail.” Jurnal Studi Hadis Nusantara 4, no. 2 (2022): 182. https://doi.org/10.24235/jshn.v4i2.12996.

Farida, Umma. “Muhammad Nasr Al-Din Al-Albani Dan Metodenya Dalam Mengkoreksi Dan Melemahkan Hadis.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis 21, no. 02 (2020): 430.

———. “Pemaknaan Kriteria Kesahihahan Hadis Muḥammad Nasir Al-Din Al-Albani Dan Implementasinya Dalam Penilaian Hadis.” Mutawatir 06, no. 01 (2017): 52–84. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2016.6.1.52-84.

H Mukhlis Mukhtar. “Hadis Maudhu’ Dan Permasalahannya.” Ash-Shahabah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Islam 3, no. 1 (2017): 77–87.

Hadi, Isam Musa. ’Ulum Al-Hadith Li Al-’Allamah Al-Albani. Beirut: Dar Ibnu Hazm, 2003.

Hanifa, Mia Syahrina, Ali Masrur, and Badri Khaeruman. “Kriteria Kesahihan Hadis Menurut Nashiruddin Albani Dan Ahmad Al-Ghumari.” Jurnal Riset Agama 02, no. 02 (2022): 488. https://doi.org/10.15575/jra.v2i2.17013.

Indah, Nurlaila, M Albi Albana, and Umi Sumbulah. “Joseph Schacht, Teori Skeptisisme Hadis Dan Bantahan-Bantahannya.” Diya Al-Afkar Jurnal Studi Al-Quran Dan Al-Hadis 9, no. 01 (2021): 110. https://doi.org/10.24235/diyaafkar.v9i01.7753.

Ismail, Muhammad Syuhudi. Hadis Nabi Menurut Pembela Pengingkar Dan Pemalsunya. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 1998.

———. Hadits Nabi Menurut Pembela Pengingkar Dan Pemalsunya. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 1995.

———. Pengantar Ilmu Hadits. Bandung: ANGKASA, 1987.

Kirin, Arwansyah Kirin. “ANALISIS HADITH DA’IF DAN MAWDU’ DALAM KITAB TA’LIM AL-MUTA’ALIM OLEH SHAYKH AL-ZARNUJI.” PERADA 3, no. 2 (December 2020): 163. https://doi.org/10.35961/perada.v3i2.202.

Makmur, and Muhammad Ismail. “Metode Kesahihan Sanad Hadis.” Al-Mutsla 03, no. 03 (2021): 92. https://doi.org/10.46870/jstain.v3i2.50.

Musyafiq, Ahmad. “Coherence Method in Matan Criticism.” Esensia Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin 20, no. 1 (2020): 37–50. https://doi.org/10.14421/esensia.v20i1.1741.

Novia, Rina. “STUDI ANALISIS PEMIKIRAN MUHAMMAD SYUHUDI ISMAIL TENTANG HADIS MAUDHU’’.” Pascasarjana UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, no. tesis (2024).

Rahim, M.R, and M Syarif. “Inkonsistensi Albani Dalam Menilai Kualitas Rawi Hadis Dalam Kitab Irwa’ Al-Galil.” Al-Bukhari 05, no. 01 (2022): 20.

Rahim, Muhammad Rafi’iy. “Manhaj Al-Albani Dalam Menetapkan Kualitas Hadis (Studi Atas Kitab Silsilah Al-Sahihah Dan Silsilah Al-Da’ifah).” Thesis. Pascsarjana UIN Alauddin Makasar, 2014.

Suryadinata, M. “Kritik Matan Hadis : Klasik Hingga Kontemporer.” Ushuluna Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin 2, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.15408/ushuluna.v2i2.15183.

Tanzilulloh, Ilham. “DELEGITIMASI HUKUM ISLAM : Studi Terhadap Hadith Maudhu’.” Al-Syakhsiyyah: Journal of Law & Family Studies 01, no. 02 (2019): 231–32. https://doi.org/10.21154/syakhsiyyah.v1i2.2028.

Yahya, Muhammad. “Kriteria Pentajrihan Periwayat Hadis Syaikh Muḥammad Nasir Al-Din Al-Albani Dalam Kitab Silsilah Al-Ahadiṡ Al-Da’ifah Wa Al-Maudu’ah Wa Asaruha Al-Sayyi’ Fi Al-Ummah.” Disertasi. Pasacarsarjana UIN Alauddin Makasar, 2015.