Harald Motzki's Method of Perspective Hadith Authenticity and His Response to Orientalist Skepticism of Hadith

Muhammad Ilham Baihaqqi; Nur Kholis

doi:10.31943/afkarjournal.v7i4.1273

Authors

Muhammad Ilham Baihaqqi Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta
Nur Kholis Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v7i4.1273

Keywords:

Authenticity, Harald Motzki, Skepticism.

Abstract

This article aims to describe the method used by Harald Motzki in exploring the authenticity of hadith and to describe his refutation of Orientalist skepticism towards hadith. Since the 19th century scientifically, orientalists began to study the authenticity of hadith as a source of Islamic teachings, the skeptical attitude of some orientalists was challenged by Muslim thinkers and several other orientalists. For Motzki, both camps have not answered the substance of the question of the authenticity of the hadith itself, he also uses certain methods in answering this. This type of research is qualitative with a descriptive-analytical method. This paper aims to reveal Harald Motzki's hadith methodology and forms of criticism of the thoughts of Orientalist figures systematically, so that readers can understand the sensitive points in hadith studies that are the target of Orientalist criticism and how to respond to them. . The results show that Motzki succeeded in proving that the Prophet's hadith can be traced back to the first century Hijriah using Musannaf 'Abd al-Razzaq as a sample. Then, Harald Motzki succeeded in breaking the theories of his predecessors with the theory of dating and isnad cum matn. He counterattacked criticism of the sanad of Ignaz Goldziher and Joseph Schacht, criticism of the common link and gold isnad of G.H.A. Juynboll. Apart from that, the contribution he made became a spark for the birth of scientific studies on hadith in the future. For example, the isnad cum matn theory is often used to identify the quality of a hadith to this day.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdurrahman Badawi. Ensiklopedi Tokoh Orientalis, judul asli: Mausu‟ah al-Mustasyriqiin, penerjemah : Amroeni Drajat. Yogyakarta: LKiS, 2003.

Adib, Shohibul. “Pemikiran Harald Motzki tentang Hadis (Telaah Metodologi Penelitian Harald Motzki Terhadap Kitab al-Musannaf Karya Abdurrazzaq as-San’ani).” An-Nidzam: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan dan Studi Islam 4, no. 1 (2017): 103–25.

Ajat Rukajat. Pendekatan Penelitian Kuantitatif: Quantitative Research Approach. Yogyakarta: CV Budi Utama, 2018.

Ali Masrur. Teori Common Link Juynboll: Melacak Akar Kesejarahan Hadist Nabi. Yogyakarta: LKIS, 2007.

Ambarwati. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (Konsep dan Praksis dalam Bidang Pendidikan Agama Islam). Pati: CV Al Kalam Media Lestari, 2022.

Amin, Kamaruddin. “Book Review: The Origins of Islamic Jurisprudence Meccan Fiqh before the Classical Schols.” dalam al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 41, no. 1 (2003).

Amiruddin, Ahmad Ramzy, dan Muhammad Alfatih Suryadilaga. “Kritik Harald Motzki Terhadap Klasifikasi Model Pemikiran Hadis Herbert Berg.” Ushuluna: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin 7, no. 1 (2021): 17–32.

Evanirosa dan Chiristina Bagenda, dkk. Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan (Library Research). Bandung: Media Sains Indonesia, 2022.

Hafidz, Nur Fiatin. “Otentisitas Hadis dan Bantahan Harald Motzki atas Skeptisisme Orientalis terhadap Hadis.” Tahdis: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Hadis 14, no. 1 (2023): 73–93.

Haitomi, Faisal, dan Muhammad Syachrofi. “Aplikasi Teori Isnad Cum Matn Harald Motzki Dalam Hadis Misoginis Penciptaan Perempuan.” Al-Bukhari: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis 3, no. 1 (2020): 29–55.

Harald Motzki. The Murder of Ibn Abi al-Huqayq: On The Origin and Reliability of Some Maghazi-Reports”, dalam Harald Motzki (ed.), The Biography of Muhammad: the Issue of the Sources. Leiden: Brill, 2000.

———. The Muṣannaf of ʿAbd al-Razzāq.., Hadit: Origins and Developments, Editor. Lawrence I. Conrad. New York: Routledge, 2016.

———. The Origin Of Islamic Jurisprudence; Meccan Fiqh before the Classical Schools. Leiden: Brill, 2002.

———. Wie glaubwurdig sind die Hadithe ?; Die klassische islamische Hadits-Kritik im Licht moderner Wissenschaft. Wiesbaden: Springer Verlag, 2013.

Hasjim Abbas. Kritik Matan Hadis Versus Muhadditsin dan Fuqaha. Yogyakarta: Kalimedia, 2016.

Herbert Berg. The development of exegesis in early Islam: The authenticity of Muslim literature from the formative period. Francis: Routledge, 2013.

Idri. Hadis dan Orientalis: Perspektif Ulama Hadis dan Para Orientalis tentang Hadis Nabi. Depok: Kencana, 2017.

———. Hadis dan Orientalis: Perspektif Ulama Hadis dan Para Orientalis tentang Hadis Nabi. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2017.

Iendy Zelivien Adhari dkk. Kumpulan Teori Penafsiran Al-Qur’an-Al-Hadis dan Teori Ekonomi Islam Menurut Para Ahli. Bandung: Widina Media Utama, 2021.

Jannah, Shofiatul. “Kritik Harald Motzki Terhadap Teori Isnad Hadis Joseph Schacht.” Riwayah: Jurnal Studi Hadis 6, no. 2 (2020). https://journal.iainkudus.ac.id/index.php/riwayah/article/view/8086.

Jayana, Thoriq Aziz, dan Nor Hasan. “MENGUJI AUTENTISITAS DAN KLAIM KESEJARAHAN HADIS BERDASARKAN TEORI COMMON LINK GHA JUYNBOLL:(Suatu Kajian Kritis).” Holistic al-Hadis 7, no. 2 (2021): 89–107.

Junaidi, M. Rofiq. “Otentitas Hadis dalam Perspektif Harald Motzki.” Al-A’raf: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam dan Filsafat 12, no. 1 (2015): 59–76.

Kamaruddin Amin. Menguji Kembali Keakuratan Metode Kritik Hadis. Jakarta: Penerbit Hikmah, 2009.

Motzki, Harald. “Quo vadis, Ḥadīṯ-Forschung? Eine kritische Untersuchung von G.H.A. Juynboll: „Nāfi’ the mawlā of Ibn ‘Umar, and his position in Muslim Ḥadīṯ Literature“.” Der Islam 73, no. 1 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1515/islm.1996.73.1.40.

———. “The Prophet and the Cat. On dating Malik”s Muwatta”and legal traditions.” Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam, no. 22 (1998): 18–83.

Mufid, Abdul. “Dating Hadits Tentang Persaksian Melihat Hilal: Telaah atas Isnad Cum Matn Analysis Harald Motzki.” Millati: Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities 2, no. 1 (2017): 85–104.

Muhammad Hasby al-Shiddiqy. Sejarah dan Pengantar Ilmu Hadis. Semarang: Pustaka Rizki Putra, 2011.

Mushthoza, Zidna Zuhdana. “COMMON LINK VIS A VIS GHARIB NISBI (Aplikasi Hadis tentang Wanita sebagai Sumber Fitnah).” UNIVERSUM: Jurnal KeIslaman dan Kebudayaan 15, no. 2 (2021). https://jurnalfuda.iainkediri.ac.id/index.php/universum/article/view/711.

Nugraha, Zakiy Muflih. “Skeptisisme Teori Common Link GHA Juynboll Terhadap Otentisitas Hadis dan Bantahan Kepadanya.” Al-Bukhari: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis 5, no. 1 (2022): 20–38.

Nugroho, Irzak Yuliardy. “Orientalisme dan Hadits: Kritik terhadap Sanad Menurut Pemikiran Joseph Schacht.” Asy-Syari’ah: Jurnal Hukum Islam 6, no. 2 (2020): 155–70.

Nugroho, Sapta Wahyu. “Dinamika Kajian Orientalis Terhadap Eksistensi Hadis Awal Abad Hijriah: Studi Pemikiran Harald Motzki Terhadap al-Musannaf ‘Abd Al-Razzaq.” Diya Al-Afkar: Jurnal Studi al-Quran dan al-Hadis 9, no. 01 (2021): 123–44.

Nur, Maizuddin M. “Analisis Isnad Cum Matn: Mengukur Kritik Hadis Muslim Dan Barat.” Substantia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin 18, no. 2 (2016): 233–46.

Sarnoto, Ahmad Zain. “Pengantar Studi Pendidikan Berbasis Al-Qur’an: Lingkungan Pendidikan Dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an.” Jurnal Statement: Media Informasi Sosial dan Pendidikan 7, no. 1 (2017): 46–55.

Setyawan, Cahya Edi. “Studi Hadis: Analisis Terhadap Pemikiran Schacht dan A’zami.” Zawiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam 4, no. 1 (2018): 1–22.

Suwarno, Rahmadi Wibowo. “Kesejarahan Hadis dalam Tinjauan Teori Common Link.” Jurnal Living Hadis 3, no. 1 (2018): 89–120.

Syamsuddin Arif. Orientalis & Diabolisme Pemikiran. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 2008.

Syukrillah, M. “Kritik Atas Kritik Amaruddin Amin Terhadap Riwayat Mudallisīs dalam Sahih Al-Bukhārī dan Sahih Muslim.” Islamika Inside: Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora 3, no. 2 (2017): 165–88.

Umi Sumbulah. Kajian Kritis Ilmu Hadits. Malang: UIN Maliki-Press, 2010.

Wazna, Ruhama. “Metode Kontemporer Menggali Otentisitas Hadis (Kajian Pemikiran Harald Motzki).” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin 17, no. 2 (2018): 112–25.

Zuhdana, Zidna, FatiaInast Tsuroya, dan Ahmad Zainal Mustofa. “Teori Projecting back dan Argumentum E-Silentio Joseph Schact Serta Aplikasinya dalam Studi Kritik Hadis.” Al-Bukhari: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis 3, no. 2 (2020): 171–86.

Zuhri, Muh. “Perkembangan Kajian Hadis Kesarjanaan Barat.” ULUL ALBAB Jurnal Studi Islam 16, no. 2 (2015): 215–34.