Empirical Legal Research based on Jasser Auda's Maqashid Syariah Theory

Authors

  • Isman Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Syamsul Hidayat Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Imran Rosyadi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Muhammad Syafri Firman Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Nimas Ayu Sholehah Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v6i4.730

Keywords:

Pragmatic Paradigm, Empirical Legal Research, Research; Maqashid Syariah Theory;

Abstract

This research highlights the limitations of the pragmatic paradigm in empirical legal research and offers a conceptual alternative using Jasser Auda's Maqasid Shariah theory. The limitations of the pragmatic paradigm include theoretical constraints, pragmatism, limited method accuracy with data, social reductionism, and weak contextualization of research findings. To address these issues, a hermeneutical approach can be employed, utilizing a more holistic theoretical framework and expanding the scope of pragmatic applications. The historical restructuring and methodological restructuring of the empirical legal research model are carried out through Jasser Auda's Maqasid Shariah theory, providing a broader understanding of legal behavior within social contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, M. A. (2001). Al-Ta’wīl al-‘Ilmī: Kearah Perubahan Paradigma Penafsiran Kitab Suci. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 39(2).

Ackoff, R. L., Aguilera-Caracuel, J., Hurtado-Torres, N. E., Aragón-Correa, J. A., Al-Mawali, H., Al-Shbiel, S. O., Alavi, M., Kayworth, T. R., Leidner, D. E., Albino, V., Garavelli, A. C., Gorgoglione, M., Alfaadhel, S., Allame, S. M., Nouri, B. A., Tavakoli, S. Y., Shokrani, S. A. R., Allame, S. M., Nouri, B. A., … van Tartwijk, J. (2010). Business research methods. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(1).

Amin Abdullah, M. (2012). Bangunan Baru Epistemologi Keilmuan Studi Hukum Islam dalam Merespon Globalisasi. Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum, 46(II).

AUDA, J. (2019). Maqasid Al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law. In Maqasid Al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvkc67tg

Brickell, K., Jeffrey, A., & McConnell, F. (2021). Practising legal geography. Area, 53(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12734

Bryan, I., Langford, P., & McGarry, J. (2015). The reconstruction of the juridico-political: Affinity and divergence in hans kelsen and max weber. In The Reconstruction of the Juridico-Political: Affinity and Divergence in Hans Kelsen and Max Weber. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203798782

Chase, A. (2017). Toward a legal theory of popular culture. In Popular Culture and Law. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315089645-16

Dewey, J. (2001). Beyond the quest for certainty. The Humanist, 55(4).

Dubber, M. D. (1998). Historical Analysis of Law. Law and History Review, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/744325

Dubber, M. D. (2015). New historical jurisprudence: legal history as critical discourse analysis of law. Critical Analysis of Law, 2(1).

Dupret, B. (2007). Legal pluralism, plurality of laws, and legal practices: Theories, critiques, and praxiological re-specification. European Journal of Legal Studies, 1(1).

Franklin, A. (1990). Experiment, Right or Wrong. In Experiment, Right or Wrong. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511527302

Gabriel, M. (2020). The Limits of Epistemology. In An den Grenzen der Erkenntnistheorie.

Harimurti, A. (2022). Pluralisme Metodologis. Suksma: Jurnal Psikologi Universitas Sanata Dharma, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.24071/suksma.v1i2.3554

Hefni, W., Ahmadi, R., & Mustofa, I. (2022). Reinventing the Human Dignity in Islamic Law Discourse: The Wasatiyah Approaches from Khaled Abou El-Fadl to the Interreligious Relation. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v16i2.6928

Hofmann, R. (2021). Formalism versus pragmatism – A comparative legal and empirical analysis of the German and Dutch criminal justice systems with regard to effectiveness and efficiency. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X211005983

Isman. (2022). Ekstrapolasi: Aksiomatik dan Kerangka Konsepsional Penalaran Ilmu Hukum Profetik. Muhammadiyah University Press.

Khashogi, L. R. (2022). Menakar Rekonstruksi Maqashid Syariah Telaah Genealogis Pendekatan System Jasser Auda. POLITEA: Jurnal Politik Islam, 5(1).

Klatt, M. (2020). Integrative Jurisprudence: Legal Scholarship and the Triadic Nature of Law. Ratio Juris, 33(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12301

Krommendijk, J. (2021). Legal formalism versus pragmatism. In National Courts and Preliminary References to the Court of Justice. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800374171.00008

Kurniawan, R. (2018). MAQASID SYARIAH DAN PEMBANGUNAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA. Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v6i2.1539

Laszlo, E. (2021). Introduction to systems philosophy: Toward a new paradigm of contemporary thought. In Introduction to Systems Philosophy: Toward a New Paradigm of Contemporary Thought. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003205586

Minkkinen, P. (2005). Why is law a normative discipline? on Hans Kelsen’s “normology.” Res Publica, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-005-1484-5

Morris, M. W., Hong, Y. yi, Chiu, C. yue, & Liu, Z. (2015). Normology: Integrating insights about social norms to understand cultural dynamics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.03.001

Olsson, E. J. (2006). Introduction the pragmatism of isaac levi. In Knowledge and Inquiry: Essays on the Pragmatism of Isaac Levi. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584312.002

Orlando, E., & Bergin, T. (2018). Forging a socio-legal approach to environmental harms. In Forging a Socio-Legal Approach to Environmental Harms. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676715-1

Orzeck, R., & Hae, L. (2020). Restructuring legal geography. Progress in Human Geography, 44(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519848637

Parjaman, T., & Akhmad, D. (2019). Ebagai “Jalan Tengah” Atas Dikotomi Kuantitatif-Kualitatif. Jurnal Moderat, 5(4).

Pérez, A. C. (2022). NEW LEGAL REALISM: A PROMISING LEGAL THEORY FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY AND EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ABOUT THE ‘LAW-IN-ACTION. Novum Jus, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.14718/NovumJus.2022.16.1.9

Posner, R. A. (2004). Legal pragmatism. Metaphilosophy, 35(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2004.00310.x

Sajtos, L., Cao, J. T., Zhang, W., Peko, G., & Sundaram, D. (2022). Developing a feature-centric and affordance-based conceptualization of social media interactions. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-02-2022-0121

Salam, S. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum Masyarakat Hukum Adat Atas Hutan Adat. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 7(2), 209. https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v7i2.a5468

Sery, J. (2022). The Rhetorical Roots of Legal Pragmatism. Journal for the History of Rhetoric, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.5325/jhistrhetoric.25.3.0303

Sidiq, S. (2017). Maqashid Syariah & Tantangan Modernitas: Sebuah Telaah Pemikiran Jasser Auda. In Right, 7(1).

Szmodis, J. (2012). On multidisciplinary legal research. Archiv Fur Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie, 98(4). https://doi.org/10.25162/arsp-2012-0038

Taekema, S. (2021). Methodologies of Rule of Law Research: Why Legal Philosophy Needs Empirical and Doctrinal Scholarship. Law and Philosophy, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-020-09388-1

Tatang, P. 1, & Akhmad, D. (2019). PENDEKATAN PENELITIAN KOMBINASI: SEBAGAI “JALAN TENGAH” ATAS DIKOTOMI KUANTITATIF-KUALITATIF. Moderat: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 5(4).

Van Klink, P. D. B., & Taekema, S. (2011). A Dynamic Model of Interdisciplinarity: Limits and Possibilities of Interdisciplinary Research into Law. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1142847

Wallace, R. A. (2022). Beyond the Add and Stir Approach: Indigenizing Comprehensive Exam Reading Lists in Canadian Political Science. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 55(3). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423922000506

Wardiono, K., & Dimyati, K. (2014). BASIS EPISTEMOLOGIS PARADIGMA RASIONAL DALAM ILMU HUKUM: SEBUAH DESKRIPSI TENTANG ASUMSI-ASUMSI DASAR TEORI HUKUM MURNI-HANS KELSEN. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2014.14.3.304

Zaprulkhan, Z. (2018). Maqāṣid Al-Shariah in the Contemporary Islamic Legal Discourse: Perspective of Jasser Auda. Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.21580/ws.26.2.3231

Downloads

Published

2023-08-11

How to Cite

Isman, Syamsul Hidayat, Imran Rosyadi, Muhammad Syafri Firman and Nimas Ayu Sholehah (2023) “Empirical Legal Research based on Jasser Auda’s Maqashid Syariah Theory”, al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies, 6(4), pp. 14–29. doi: 10.31943/afkarjournal.v6i4.730.

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>