Methodological Evolution and Convergence: A Comparative Study of Legal Istinbāṭ in the Fatwas of MUI, Nahdlatul Ulama, and Muhammadiyah

Authors

  • Asro Asro UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
  • Jaenudin Jaenudin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v6i4.3335

Keywords:

Fatwa, Istinbāṭ, MUI, NU, Muhammadiyah

Abstract

Islamic legal authority in Indonesia is distributed among three primary institutional pillars: the Indonesian Council of Ulama (MUI), Nahdlatul Ulama, and Muhammadiyah. This research investigates their methodological frameworks of legal istinbāṭ until 2022 to address the persistent gap between finite religious texts and the infinite complexity of modern contexts.  Employing a qualitative-comparative method through library research, the study analyzes purely textual data from official institutional records and academic publications. The findings reveal that MUI utilizes a hierarchical approach (Nash Qath’i, Qauli, and Manhaji) designed to achieve national consensus through collective legal reasoning. Nahdlatul Ulama maintains traditionalist identity through its tiered Qauli, Ilhaqi, and Manhaji methods, emphasizing school-based continuity. Conversely, Muhammadiyah employs a reformist Manhaj Tarjih via Bayani, Ta’lili, and Istishlahi procedures to prioritize rational evidence. Divergent legal outcomes appear in sectors such as digital family law and cryptocurrency. The study concludes that despite divergent epistemological foundations, these institutions increasingly converge on Maqāṣid al-Sharī’ah as a primary normative compass. This evolution facilitates a balanced “Indonesianization” of Islamic law within a modern pluralistic landscape.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amalia, H. (2019). Muhammadiyah: Metode dan Praktik Berijtihad. MUADDIB: Studi Kependidikan Dan Keislaman, 9(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.24269/muaddib.v1i2.1535

Ansori. (2022). Position of fatwa in Islamic law: The effectiveness of MUI, NU, and Muhammadiyah fatwas. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 22(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v22i1.53-72

Ansori, I. (2014). Perbedaan Metode Ijtihad Nahdlatul Ulama dan Muhammadiyah dalam Corak Fikih di Indonesia. Nizam, 4(1), 126–142. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/154605-ID-none.pdf

Awass, O. (2019). Fatwa, Discursivity, and the Art of Ethical Embedding. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 87(3), 765–790. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfz031

Azhari, D. & Asmuni. (2023). Istinbathh Method Analysis of Nahdlatul Ulama in Determining Islamic Law in Indonesia. NAHNU: Journal of Nahdlatul Ulama and Contemporary Islamic Studies, 1(2), 107–118. https://ojs.nupalengaan.or.id/NAHNU/article/download/28/9

Beka, R. (2021). Maqaşid and the Renewal of Islamic Legal Theory in ’Abdullah Bin Bayyah’s Discourse. American Journal of Islam & Society, 38(3/4). https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v38i3-4.2987

Daud, F. K., & Hambali, M. R. (2022). METODE ISTINBATH NAHDLATUL ULAMA (NU): Kajian atas Strategi Fatwa dalam Tradisi Bahts al-Masail di Indonesia. Millennial: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Islam, 2(1), 1–22. https://www.jurnal.alhamidiyah.ac.id/index.php/Millennial/article/download/182/172

Hasyim, S. (2020). Fatwas and Democracy: Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI, Indonesian Ulema Council) and Rising Conservatism in Indonesian Islam. TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia, 8(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/trn.2019.13

Iqbal, M. (2020). Metode Talfiq Manhaji MUI dalam Fatwa. Al-Adl, 13(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.31332/aladl.v13i2.1873

Jalili, I., Ulfa, F., & Sahid, M. M. (2023). Nahdlatul Ulama’s Ijtihad Method in Fatwa. Justicia Islamica: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial, 20(2), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v20i2.5971

Kusumastuti, H., Rosyadi, I., Nugraha, T. P., & Rhain, A. (2022). Concepts of Ijtihad Bayani, Ta’lili, and Istislahi on Muhammadiyah and Qauli Approach to NU. 73–78. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220708.010

Lubis, S. A. S. (2022). Renewal of Ijtihad in the Modern Era: Historical Background and Current Developments. International Journal Reglement & Society (IJRS), 3(2), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.55357/ijrs.v3i2.223

Mahfudin, A. (2021). Metodologi Istinbath Hukum Lembaga Bahtsul Masail Nahdlatul Ulama. Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 6(1), 1–17. https://journal.unipdu.ac.id/index.php/jhki/article/view/2573/1276

Masrukhin, M. (2018). The Islamic Mass Organization Contribution in Protecting the ReligiosityInclusive and Diversity in Indonesia. ADDIN, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.21043/addin.v12i2.4541

Menchik, J. (2022). The Politics of the Fatwa: Islamic Legal Authority in Modern Indonesia. Indonesia, 114(1), 75–97. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/255/article/869999

Mujahid, M. Z. (2023, September 25). Contoh Qath’i dan Zhanni dalam Nas Alquran. Tafsir Al Quran | Referensi Tafsir di Indonesia. https://tafsiralquran.id/contoh-qathi-dan-zhanni-dalam-nas-alquran/

Mutakin, A. (2018). Kitab Kuning dan Tradisi Intelektual Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) dalam Penentuan Hukum. Syariah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.18592/sy.v18i2.2270

Nurhidaya, M. (2023). Pandangan Majelis Tarjih dan Tajdid Pimpinan Pusat Muhammadiyah terhadap Perceraian di Luar Pengadilan [UIN Sunan Kalijaga]. http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/62436

Quraishi, A. (2007). Interpreting the Qur’an and the Constitution: Similarities in the Use of Text, Tradition, and Reason in Islamic and American Jurisprudence. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.963142

Rachmadhani, F., Sahid, M. M., & Mokhtar, A. W. (2022). Implementation of the Islamic Law Transformation’s Rule (taghayyur Ahkām) During Covid-19 Pandemic in the Perspective of Majelis Tarjih Muhammadiyah in Indonesia. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 10(1), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol10no1.345

Rokhmadi, R., Khasan, M., & Amin, N. (2023). Understanding Riddah in Islamic Jurisprudence: Between Textual Interpretation and Human Rights. Theological Studies/Teologiese Studies, 79(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v79i1.8613

Saeed, A. (1997). Ijtihad and innovation in neo‐modernist Islamic thought in Indonesia. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 8(3), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596419708721127

Setyaningsih. (2022). Fatwa Institutions in Islamic Law. Awang Long Law Review, 5(1), 314–320. https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v5i1.566

Sholeh, M. A. N., Faiz, M. F., & Anwar, M. M. (2022). A Critical Analysis of Islamic Law and Fatwa of MUI & NU on A Gold-Backed Cryptocurrency (OneGram). Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial, 17(2), 506–530. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-Ihkam.v17i2.6511

Tahmid, K., & Zaki, M. (2019). Implementation of DSN-MUI Fatwa In Handling of Sharia Economic Problems (A Case in Syariah Bank of Bandar Lampung). Al-’Adalah, 16(2), 263–286. https://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/adalah/article/view/3520

Wahyudi, H. F., & Fajar, F. (2018). Metode Ijtihad Komisi Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia dan Aplikasinya dalam Fatwa. Cakrawala: Jurnal Studi Islam, 13(2), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.31603/cakrawala.v13i2.2402

Zamroni, M. (2018). Peran DSN-MUI dalam Kegiatan Perbankan Syari’ah. Tasyri’: Jurnal Tarbiyah-Syari’ah Islamiyah, 25(1), 45–56.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-02

How to Cite

Asro, A. and Jaenudin, J. (2023) “Methodological Evolution and Convergence: A Comparative Study of Legal Istinbāṭ in the Fatwas of MUI, Nahdlatul Ulama, and Muhammadiyah ”, al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies, 6(4), pp. 950–968. doi: 10.31943/afkarjournal.v6i4.3335.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.