Comparative Study of Polygamous Marriage Law in Indonesia and Tunisia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v8i4.1806Keywords:
Polygamy, Marriage Law, Comparative Study, Social and CultureAbstract
Polygamy is a practice recognized by law in some countries, although its implementation often sparks debate from social, cultural, and legal perspectives. In Indonesia, polygamy is regulated by Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage, which imposes certain limits and strict requirements, while in Tunisia, polygamy has been explicitly prohibited since the enactment of the Code du Statut Personnel (CSP) in 1956. This study aims to examine the regulations, legal provisions, and the social and legal impacts of polygamy practices in these two countries. Using a qualitative method with a normative approach, this research explores the comparison of legal foundations, government policies, and the implementation of regulations related to polygamy, identifying the differences and similarities. The results of this study show that Indonesia and Tunisia have different approaches to polygamy, with Indonesia allowing polygamy within certain limits, while Tunisia strictly prohibits it. Both countries seek to protect women's rights in the context of marriage, although the implementation of these policies faces various social and cultural challenges.
Downloads
References
Adnyani, Ni Ketut Sari. 2016. “Bentuk Perkawinan Matriarki Pada Masyarakat Hindu Bali Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hukum Adat Dan Kesetaraan Gender.” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora 5(1):754–69. doi: 10.23887/jish-undiksha.v5i1.8284.
Asiva Noor Rachmayani. 2015. “HUKUM KELUARGA DI TUNISIA DAN INDONESIA (Studi Syariah Dalam Konteks Negara-Negara Modern Di Dunia Islam.” Kordinat: Jurnal Komunikasi Antar Perguruan Tinggi Agama Islam 6.
Budiman. 2018. “Tinjauan Maqasid Al- Syari‘ah Pada Pasal 56 Dan 57 Kompilasi Hukum Islam Tentang Izin Poligami.” ISTI’DAL; Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam 5(1):1–20.
Cahyani, Andi Intan. 2018. “Poligami Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Al-Qadau: Peradilan Dan Hukum Keluarga Islam 5(2):271. doi: 10.24252/al-qadau.v5i2.7108.
Evra Willya. 2023. “PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM KEWARISAN DI DUNIA ISLAM (Studi Terhadap Radd Dalam Fikih Dan UU Hukum Keluarga Di Mesir, Syiria, Sudan, Dan Tunisia) Evra.” Journal of Islamic Law and Economics 3:185–201.
Fitri, Wilda. 2022. “Problematika Kodifikasi Hukum Keluarga Pada Masa Modern.” Sakena: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 7(2).
Imron, Ali. 2012. “Menimbang Poligami Dalam Hukum Perkawinan.” Qistie 6(1). doi: 10.31942/jqi.v6i1.550.
Lewa, Irfan, and others. 2022. “Konsep Adil Dalam Poligami Perspektif Muhammad Quraish Shihab Dan Amina Wadud.” Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab Dan Hukum.
Mubarok, Muhammad Fuad, Maimun Maimun, and Ahmad Sukandi. 2022. “Analisis Terhadap Pemikiran Husein Muhammad Tentang Konsep Poligami.” El-Izdiwaj: Indonesian Journal of Civil and Islamic Family Law. doi: 10.24042/el-izdiwaj.v3i1.12757.
Pua, Brendah, Deicy N. Karamoy, and Mercy M. M.Setlight. 2022. “Kedudukan Asas Monogami Dalam Pengaturan Hukum Perkawinan Di Indonesia.” NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial 9(6):2373–2403.
Ratih Lusiana Bancin. 2018. “Hukum Keluarga Islam Di Tunisia.” Penelitian Medan Agama 9(2):283–308.
Rizki, Irawan. 2021. “Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, Dan Teknologi Universitas Jambi Fakultas Hukum.” Universitas Jambi.
Sumarningsih, Indah, Wati Rahmi Ria, and Elly Nurlaili. 2018. “Poligami Menurut Undang-Uundang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan Dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam.” Pactum Low Journal 2(01):493.
Ummah, Masfi Sya’fiatul. 2019. “Diskursus Makna Keadilan Dalam Poligami.” Sustainability (Switzerland) 11(1):1–14.
Undang-undang, D. A. N. Penerapannya Dalam, Pascasarjana Iain, Raden Intan, Jl Z. A. Pagar Alam, Bandar Lampung, Undang Perkawinan, and Islam Artikel. 1982. “Batas Usia Perkawinan Menurut Fukaha Dan Penerapannya Dalam Undang-.” Al-’Adalah 12:hlm, 807-826.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fathor Rozy, Mohammad Ainul Hakim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.












