Legal Politics of Instruments for Punishing Corruptors Based on the Draft Law on Asset Confiscation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v8i3.1651Keywords:
Assets, Forfeiture, CorruptionAbstract
This research addresses the gap between criminal law policies for corruptors andthe implementation of the Asset Forfeiture Law in Indonesia. Although legal regulations have been established, their implementation remains suboptimal, particularly regarding the recovery of assets illegally obtained by corrupt individuals. Several factors, such as slow legal processes, weak law enforcement, and political instability, hinder the effectiveness of corruption eradication. This highlights the need for reforms in the legal system and law enforcement in Indonesia to ensure a more just and efficient process. This study adopts a normative juridical approach by combining three methods: the Legislative Approach, the Philosophical Approach, and the Asset Forfeiture Ownership Approach in Islamic law. These approaches aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the legal, moral, and religious aspects of asset forfeiture and its implications within the context of modern law. Through this exploration, the research is expected to offer solutions to existing problems while recommending legal reforms to enhance the effectiveness of corruption eradication in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Agustine, Oly Viana. "RUU Perampasan Aset Sebagai Peluang Dan Tantangan Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia," Peneliti pada Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara Mahkamah Konstitusi, email: olyviana@mahkamahkonstitusi.go.id.
Dwi Kusuma, Kausar. Kajian Yuridis Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi Melalui Sarana Mutual Legal Assistance, Skripsi Universitas Brawijaya, hlm. 13. Diakses melalui http://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/195 pada tanggal 15 Maret 2024.
Erdianto, Kristian. Skor IPK Tak Meningkat Agenda Pemberantasan Korupsi Dinilai Stagnan. Dapat diakses di: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2018/02/22/23550051/skor-ipk-tak-meningkat-agenda-pemberantasan-korupsi-dinilai-stagnan (diakses 13 Maret 2024), hlm. 7.
Pohan, Agustinus. Pengembalian Aset Kejahatan. Yogyakarta: Pusat Kajian Anti Korupsi Fakultas Hukum UGM, hlm. 18.
Riset Publik. (2019). Tantangan Penerapan Perampasan Aset Tanpa Tuntutan Pidana Non Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture dalam RUU Perampasan Aset di Indonesia. Dapat diakses di: https://acch.kpk.go.id/id/artikel/riset-publik/tantangan-penerapan-perampasan-aset-tanpa-tuntutan-pidana-non-conviction-based-asset-forfeiture-dalam-ruu-perampasan-aset-di-indonesia (diakses 15 Maret 2024).
Saputra, Refki. (2017). Tantangan Penerapan Perampasan Aset Tanpa Tuntutan Pidana (Non Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture dalam RUU Perampasan Aset di Indonesia), hlm. 118.
Saputra, Refki. Tantangan Penerapan Perampasan Aset Tanpa Tuntutan Pidana (Non Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture dalam RUU Perampasan Aset di Indonesia), hlm. 118-119.
Undang-Undang No. 31 tahun 1999.
Undang-Undang No. 8 tahun 2010.
Undang-Undang No. 20 tahun 2001.
Peraturan Pemerintah No. 27 tahun 2021
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Nur Khaliq

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.












