YouTube Content as an Object of Fiduciary Collateral: A Maqashid Syariah Perspective

Amrih Makarimal Ahmad

doi:10.31943/afkarjournal.v9i2.2177

Authors

Amrih Makarimal Ahmad Universitas Islam Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v9i2.2177

Keywords:

YouTube Content, Fiduciary Collateral, Maqashid Syariah

Abstract

YouTube content has evolved into a valuable economic asset and can be used as an object of fiduciary collateral based on Government Regulation No. 24 of 2022 on the Creative Economy. This regulation recognizes intellectual property rights (IPR), including copyright over digital content, as a form of collateral that can be utilized to obtain financing from financial institutions. However, the implementation of YouTube content as fiduciary collateral still faces various challenges, particularly in legal, economic, and Maqashid Syariah compliance aspects. This study analyzes the ratio legis and ontological foundation of this policy and its implications from the perspective of Maqashid Syariah. Under Indonesia’s positive law, YouTube content as copyright is classified as an intangible asset recognized under Article 499 of the Indonesian Civil Code (KUH Perdata) and can be transferred through a fiduciary agreement. However, for it to be used as collateral, the content must have a clear economic value, be tradable, and provide legal certainty for creditors regarding collateral execution. From the Maqashid Syariah perspective, the principle of asset protection (hifzhul maal) plays a central role in determining the eligibility of an asset as collateral. YouTube content with stable economic value and clear ownership may align with this principle, as long as transactions do not involve gharar (uncertainty) and do not disadvantage any party. The research findings indicate that while YouTube content can legally serve as fiduciary collateral under Indonesia’s positive law, uncertainties remain in its implementation and enforcement. From the Maqashid Syariah perspective, ensuring legal certainty and transparency in transactions is crucial for this mechanism to align with Islamic principles of justice. Therefore, further regulatory measures are needed to ensure that digital content used as collateral meets the requirements of economic value certainty, lawful ownership, and a well-defined execution mechanism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adi, Akbar, Satria Achmad, Anwar Budiman, and Uyan Wiryadi. 2024. “Konsekuensi Hukum Dan Tantangan Penggunaan Konten YouTube Sebagai Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Ekonomi Kreatif Di Indonesia” 13:289–96. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v13i2.850.

Andini Setiani Umar. 2024. “Kedudukan Hak Cipta Sebagai Hak Kebendaan Dan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Atas Hak Cipta.” Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial Dan Politik 1 (3): 28–41. https://doi.org/10.62383/demokrasi.v1i3.239.

Auliazahara, O, and M F M Putra. 2022. “Youtube Content as an Object Of Fiduciary Guarantee in a Debt Receivable Agreement.” Legal Brief 11 (5): 2968–76. https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.xx.xx.

Budiman, Arif, and Inda Rahadiyan. 2024. “Kelemahan Pengaturan Konten Youtube Sebagai Agunan Kredit Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Perlindungan Bank.” Prosiding Nasional Hukum Aktual Perkembangan Dan Isu Hukum Keperdataan-Bisnis Kontemporer, 191–209. https://journal.uii.ac.id/psha/article/view/34114.

Clara, Josephine, Lamuli Siahaan, O K Saidin, and Detania Sukarja. 2023. “ARBITER : Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum Tinjauan Yuridis Penggunaan Konten YouTube Sebagai Objek Jaminan Kredit Di Bank Legal Review of the Use of YouTube Content as Collateral for Credit in Banks” 5 (September): 213–23. https://doi.org/10.31289/arbiter.v5i2.2644.

Fauziah, Hanifa Nur, and Mahlil Adriaman. 2024. “Konten Youtube Sebagai Jaminan Bagi Pelaku Ekonomi Kreatif Dalam Perspektif Hukum Jaminan.” Puan Indonesia 5 (2): 668–81. https://doi.org/10.37296/jpi.v5i2.251.

Gunawan, Ahmad Bahyj, and Pandam Nurwulan. n.d. “Konten Youtube Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia Berbasis Pembiayaan Kekayaan Intelektual,” 138–51.

Hardani, dkk. 2020. Buku Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Dan Kualitatif. Repository.Uinsu.Ac.Id.

Maulana, Putri Wahyu. 2023. “Perjanjian Lisensi Berupa Konten YouTube Pada Jaminan Fidusia Menurut Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 2022 Tentang Ekonomi Kreatif.” Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance 3 (1): 529–39. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i1.199.

Mayshinta, Aura, and Muh. Jufri Ahmad. 2023. “Perlindungan Terhadap Kreditur Pemegang Jaminan Fidusia Atas Hak Cipta Konten Youtube.” Breaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance 3 (1): 51–63. http://bureaucracy.gapenas-publisher.org/index.php/home/article/view/164.

Neysa, Zafirah, A S Annisa, Syaufika Yustisia, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jl Sosio, Justicia No, Kab Sleman, and D I Yogyakarta. 2024. “Viva Justicia : Journal of Private Law” 1:125–44.

Nurcahyo, Febry Wahyu. n.d. “Febry Wahyu Nurcahyo Dkk” 2:277–96.

Paramesti Justiciari, Sekar, Laras Nada Doa, Kharisma Annisa Dyah Isnandar, and Kanariswi Parama Justicianov. 2023. “Proceeding of Conference on Law and Social Studies Peluang Dan Tantangan Skema Valuasi Youtube Sebagai Objek Jaminan Kredit Perbankan,” no. 24. http://prosiding.unipma.ac.id/index.php/COLaS.

Pujiono, Poppy, Poppy Pujiono, and Abraham Yazdi Martin. 2025. “Pengembangan Model Pengikatan Jaminan Fidusia Dari Objek Bangunan Gedung Untuk Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Eksekusi Jaminan Development of A Fiduciary Guarantee Binding Model of Building Objects for Legal Certainty Against Collateral Execution,” 26–34.

Purwita Lana, Viskha, Switcha Differentia Ariapramuda, Irene Maria Angela, Azalia Rahma Utami, and Valencia Gustin. 2022. “Urgensi Kelengkapan Teknis Dalam Regulasi Penggunaan Konten YouTube Sebagai Jaminan.” Padjadjaran Law Review 10 (2). https://doi.org/10.56895/plr.v10i2.1035.

Rani, Annisyatulhuda, Ayuningtyas Sutikno, and Fairuz Sabiq. 2024. “Analisis Konten Youtube Sebagai Jaminan Fidusia Pada Perbankan Syariah . 1 , 2 , 3 Pascasarjana Hukum Ekonomi Syariah , UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta , Surakarta , Indonesia ) PENDAHULUAN Youtube Menjadi Salah Satu Platform Untuk Saling Terhubung Melalui V” 5 (1): 869–82.

Soinbala, Rebica Stevani, and Ufran Ufran. 2023. “Tinjauan Yuridis Konten Youtube Sebagai Objek Jaminan Di Bank.” Indonesia Berdaya 4 (2): 495–500. https://doi.org/10.47679/ib.2023444.

Sutikno, Annisyatulhuda Rani Ayuningtyas, and Fairuz Sabiq. 2023. “Analysis of Youtube Content As Fiduciary Collateral in Sharia Banking.” UNTAG Law Review 7 (1): 36. https://doi.org/10.56444/ulrev.v7i1.3881.

Waruwu, Marinu. 2023. “Pendekatan Penelitian Pendidikan: Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Dan Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Method).” Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai 7 (1): 2896–2910.

Widiarta, Kadek Agus, Khalisah Hayatuddin, and Abdul Latif Mahfuz. 2025. “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP ATAS HAK CIPTA KONTEN YOUTUBE : IMPLIKASI DAN TANTANGAN” 13:143–54.

Zai, Elvira Lorna Fidelia, Theresia Nolda Agnes Narwadan, and Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun. 2023. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditur Atas Jaminan Hutang Berupa Hak Cipta Konten Youtube.” PATTIMURA Law Study Review 1:233–45.

Zakaria, Zurisman, and Wahyudi Umar. 2023. “Penggunaan Properti Virtual Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia : Potensi Dan Tantangan The Use of Virtual Property as Fiduciary Collateral Objects : Potentials and Challenges.” Halu Oleo Law Review 7 (1): 1–12.